All comparisons

Arcobay vs Swimm

Swimm focuses on doc sync to code. Arcobay goes further.

We own visual architecture and decisions on the diagram — not just inline code documentation.

Key differences

What Arcobay adds beyond Swimm.

Capability checklist

Side-by-side with Swimm.

How Arcobay compares on the capabilities teams care about most.

CapabilitySwimmArcobay
Auto diagrams from repo
Partial
YesScan + webhooks
Diagrams before code exists
No
YesPrompt path → merge with repo
Why on the diagram (not separate ADRs)
No
YesDecision notes on nodes
Drift + undocumented-change alerts
Partial
YesDrift + decision-gap nudges
Q&A grounded in code + decisions
No
Yes
AI structural code audit
No
Yes
Stakeholder auto-simplified view
No
Yes
Onboarding tour for new hires
No
Yes
Comments on architecture components
No
Yes
Multi-repo unified architecture
No
Yes
Animated video export
No
YesMP4 / WebM / GIF
Living doc sync to GitHub
Yes
YesARCHITECTURE.md + PNG on drift
Team + billing + notifications E2E
Partial
Yes

Choose Arcobay when…

  • You want a visual architecture map that stays accurate from code
  • Decision context should live on diagram components, not scattered doc fragments
  • You need onboarding, Q&A, video exports, and stakeholder views in one product

Swimm may still fit when…

  • Your team only needs inline code documentation synced to specific files
  • You already maintain architecture elsewhere and just want snippet sync

Related

Other comparisons to explore.

See Arcobay on your codebase

Connect a repository or start with a prompt. Living diagrams, decisions, and doc sync — without maintaining a separate model or whiteboard.