Choose Arcobay when…
- You want a visual architecture map that stays accurate from code
- Decision context should live on diagram components, not scattered doc fragments
- You need onboarding, Q&A, video exports, and stakeholder views in one product
Arcobay vs Swimm
We own visual architecture and decisions on the diagram — not just inline code documentation.
Key differences
Capability checklist
How Arcobay compares on the capabilities teams care about most.
| Capability | Swimm | Arcobay |
|---|---|---|
| Auto diagrams from repo | Partial | YesScan + webhooks |
| Diagrams before code exists | No | YesPrompt path → merge with repo |
| Why on the diagram (not separate ADRs) | No | YesDecision notes on nodes |
| Drift + undocumented-change alerts | Partial | YesDrift + decision-gap nudges |
| Q&A grounded in code + decisions | No | Yes |
| AI structural code audit | No | Yes |
| Stakeholder auto-simplified view | No | Yes |
| Onboarding tour for new hires | No | Yes |
| Comments on architecture components | No | Yes |
| Multi-repo unified architecture | No | Yes |
| Animated video export | No | YesMP4 / WebM / GIF |
| Living doc sync to GitHub | Yes | YesARCHITECTURE.md + PNG on drift |
| Team + billing + notifications E2E | Partial | Yes |
Related
Connect a repository or start with a prompt. Living diagrams, decisions, and doc sync — without maintaining a separate model or whiteboard.